EVALUATION OF THE EFFECTIVENESS OF A TOPICAL MIXTURE OF BACITRACIN, POLYMYXIN B, CLOTRIMAZOLE AND BETAMETHASONE CREAM IN THE TREATMENT OF EXPERIMENTALLY INDUCED OTITIS EXTERNA IN RATS
2University of Health Sciences, Samsun City Hospital, Otorhinolaryngology Department, Samsun, Türkiye
3Samsun University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Otolaryngology, Samsun, Türkiye
4Samsun City Hospital, Pathology Specialist, Samsun, Türkiye
5Samsun University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Microbiology, Samsun, Türkiye
6Ondokuz Mayıs University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Pharmacology, Samsun, Türkiye
Summary
Aim: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical, microbiological, and histopathological effects of a topical combination of bacitracin, polymyxin B, clotrimazole, and betamethasone in the treatment of iatrogenic acute otitis externa induced in the external ear canal of rats.Materials and Methods: A total of 39 adult Wistar albino rats were included. Acute external otitis was created by mechanical trauma to the external auditory canal. The rats were randomly divided into three groups: a control group treated with isotonic saline, a group treated with ciprofloxacin–dexamethasone drops, and a group treated with a combination of bacitracin–polymyxin B ointment, clotrimazole cream, and betamethasone cream. Cultures and histopathological evaluations were performed at multiple time points.
Results: The combination group demonstrated a bacterial eradication rate of 71.4% on day 10, which was significantly higher compared to the control group. Histopathological evaluation showed reduced epithelial thickness and edema in the treatment groups.
Conclusion: The combination therapy may be considered as an alternative treatment for patients with difficulties in regular drop application due to its antibacterial, antifungal, and anti-inflammatory properties, weekly application, and low cost. Planned experimental animal studies or clinical trials involving a larger group are needed to evaluate the efficacy of the treatment.
Introduction
Acute otitis externa (AOE) is an inflammatory disorder of the external auditory canal characterized by otalgia, otorrhea, pruritus, and canal edema. It is one of the most common otologic conditions encountered in both primary care and otolaryngology practice and may significantly impair quality of life because of severe pain and temporary conductive hearing loss [1-3]. Bacterial pathogens, particularly Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus, account for most cases of AOE, whereas fungal organisms such as Aspergillus and Candida species are responsible for a smaller but clinically important proportion of infections, especially following prolonged topical antibiotic therapy or recurrent disease [4-6].Current evidence-based clinical practice guidelines recommend topical antimicrobial therapy, with or without corticosteroids, as the first-line treatment for uncomplicated AOE because topical administration achieves high local drug concentrations while minimizing systemic adverse effects [1,2,5]. Fluoroquinolone-based preparations, either alone or combined with corticosteroids, are widely prescribed because of their favorable efficacy, safety profile, and low risk of ototoxicity [7,8,9].
Despite generally favorable treatment outcomes, several therapeutic challenges remain, including recurrent disease, inappropriate antibiotic prescribing, antimicrobial stewardship concerns, mixed bacterial–fungal infections, and patient adherence to treatment regimens requiring multiple daily administrations [10-12]. Recent systematic reviews have demonstrated that although topical therapies are highly effective, no single antimicrobial regimen has consistently shown superiority over others, highlighting the need to investigate alternative topical treatment strategies [5,12]. Topical combination therapies that simultaneously target bacterial pathogens, fungal organisms, and inflammation may therefore represent an attractive therapeutic option in selected clinical settings.
Bacitracin provides activity against Gram-positive bacteria, whereas polymyxin Bis highly active against Gram-negative organisms, particularly Pseudomonas aeruginosa, the predominant pathogen in AOE [4,13]. Clotrimazole provides broad antifungal coverage against Candida and Aspergillus species, while betamethasone reduces inflammation, tissue edema, and pain, potentially improving local healing and patient comfort [6,13]. The combined use of these agents has been described for persistent inflammatory disorders of the external auditory canal; however, experimental evidence supporting this specific combination remains limited [13,14].
To our knowledge, no previous experimental study has evaluated this four-drug topical combination using both microbiological and histopathological outcome measures in an animal model of acute otitis externa. Therefore, the present study aimed to compare a topical mixture of bacitracin, polymyxin B, clotrimazole, and betamethasone with topical ciprofloxacin–dexamethasone and isotonic saline using microbiological and histopathological outcome measures in experimentally induced acute otitis externa in rats.
Methods
Experimental AnimalsThirty-nine adult male Wistar albino rats weighing 250–300 g were included in this experimental study. The animals were housed under standard laboratory conditions at a controlled temperature of 22 ± 2°C with 50–60% relative humidity under a 12-hour light/dark cycle and had free access to standard laboratory chow and water throughout the study period. The study protocol was approved by the Ondokuz Mayıs University Animal Experiments Local Ethics Committee (Approval No. 2020/39). All experimental procedures were conducted in accordance with institutional guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals.
Experimental Design
Following induction of acute otitis externa, the animals were randomly assigned to one of three treatment groups:
Group 1 (Control): isotonic saline Group 2: topical ciprofloxacin–dexamethasone Group 3: topical bacitracin–polymyxin B, clotrimazole, and betamethasone combination Microbiological cultures and histopathological examinations were performed according to the study protocol on days 4, 7, 10, and 20 after treatment.
Anesthesia
All procedures were performed under general anesthesia induced by intraperitoneal administration of ketamine hydrochloride (50 mg/kg) and xylazine hydrochloride (5 mg/kg). Adequate anesthesia was confirmed before all experimental procedures.
Microbiological Evaluation
Sterile swab specimens were collected from the external auditory canal before treatment and at predetermined follow-up time points. Samples were cultured using standard microbiological techniques, and bacterial growth was recorded as positive or negative according to routine laboratory evaluation.
Histopathological Evaluation
Following euthanasia, temporal bone specimens were harvested and fixed in 10% neutral buffered formalin. After decalcification and routine tissue processing, paraffin-embedded sections were stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Histopathological evaluation included epithelial thickness, inflammatory cell infiltration, and tissue edema. All specimens were evaluated by the same experienced pathologist, who was blinded to the treatment allocation throughout the histopathological assessment.
Statistical Analysis
Statistical analyses were performed using Minitab Statistical Software (Version 20.3; Minitab LL C, State College, PA, USA). Categorical microbiological outcomes were compared using Fisher’s exact test because of the relatively small sample sizes. Pairwise comparisons of bacterial eradication rates between groups were performed using the two-proportion test. Histopathological findings were analyzed using appropriate non-parametric statistical methods because of the ordinal nature of the variables. A two-sided p value <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Microbiological FindingsAcute otitis externa was successfully established in all experimental animals before treatment. Microbiological culture results obtained during the follow-up period are presented in Table 1, and pairwise statistical comparisons are summarized in Table 2. On day 4, both the ciprofloxacin–dexamethasone group and the bacitracin–polymyxin B–clotrimazole–betamethasone combination group demonstrated significantly lower bacterial growth than the control group (p < 0.05). No statistically significant difference was observed between the two active treatment groups. Similar findings were obtained on days 7 and 10, with both treatment groups showing significantly greater bacterial eradication than the control group, whereas bacterial eradication rates remained comparable between the active treatment groups. By day 20, bacterial growth was not detected in any of the remaining animals.
Histopathological Findings
Representative histopathological findings are presented in Figure 1. Histopathological examination demonstrated progressive improvement in epithelial architecture and inflammatory changes in both treatment groups throughout the follow-up period. A significant reduction in epithelial thickness was observed in the ciprofloxacin–dexamethasone group on day 4 and in the combination therapy group on day 7 compared with the control group (p = 0.05). No statistically significant differences were detected between the two active treatment groups with respect to epithelial thickness. No statistically significant differences were observed among the groups regarding stromal thickness, edema, inflammatory cell infiltration, or fibroblastic activity at any evaluation time point (p > 0.05). Nevertheless, both treatment groups showed a consistent trend toward reduced inflammatory changes and improved tissue architecture compared with the control group.
Table 1: Culture-based bacterial isolation rates
Figure 1
Overall Findings
Overall, both topical treatment regimens achieved significantly greater microbiological eradication than the control treatment. Histopathological findings supported tissue recovery in both treatment groups, with no significant differences between the ciprofloxacin–dexamethasone and bacitracin–polymyxin B–clotrimazole–betamethasone groups.
Discussion
The present experimental study demonstrated that the bacitracin–polymyxin B–clotrimazole–betamethasone combination achieved microbiological eradication and histopathological improvement comparable to those obtained with topical ciprofloxacin–dexamethasone in an experimental model of acute otitis externa. Both treatment regimens resulted in significantly greater bacterial eradication than the untreated control group, whereas no statistically significant differences were observed between the two active treatment groups. Although significant reductions in epithelial thickness were observed at selected time points, other histopathological parameters were generally comparable between the treatment groups.Table 2: Pairwise comparison of bacterial growth between treatment groups
These findings suggest that the combination preparation exhibited therapeutic activity similar to that of the standard topical antibiotic–steroid regimen under the experimental conditions of this study.
Acute otitis externa is one of the most common infectious diseases encountered in otolaryngology practice and is characterized by diffuse inflammation of the external auditory canal, most frequently caused by Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus. Current evidence-based guidelines recommend topical antimicrobial therapy, with or without corticosteroids, as the first-line treatment for uncomplicated AOE because topical administration provides high local drug concentrations while minimizing systemic exposure and adverse effects[1,2].
Systemic antibiotics are generally reserved for patients with infection extending beyond the external auditory canal, immunocompromised individuals, or those with specific clinical indications, as their routine use has not been shown to improve outcomes in uncomplicated disease and may contribute to unnecessary antibiotic exposure [1,3,9]. Recent systematic evidence has demonstrated that most currently available topical preparations achieve comparable clinical cure rates, with no consistent superiority of one antimicrobial class over another. Consequently, treatment selection should be based on factors such as tympanic membrane integrity, safety profile, patient adherence, local antimicrobial susceptibility, and cost rather than antibiotic class alone[2,5,6]. These findings support the rationale for evaluating alternative topical formulations with broad antimicrobial and anti-inflammatory activity. In the present study, the bacitracin–polymyxin B–clotrimazole–betamethasone combination demonstrated microbiological efficacy comparable to that of ciprofloxacin–dexamethasone, which is consistent with the current understanding that multiple topical treatment strategies may provide similar therapeutic outcomes when appropriately selected [6-8].
The rationale for investigating the bacitracin–polymyxin B–clotrimazole–betamethasone combination is based on the complementary pharmacological properties of its individual components. Bacitracin primarily targets Gram-positive bacteria by inhibiting bacterial cell wall synthesis, whereas polymyxin B exhibits potent activity against Gram-negative organisms, particularly Pseudomonas aeruginosa, the most frequently isolated pathogen in acute otitis externa. Consequently, the combination of these two antibacterial agents provides broad antimicrobial coverage against the predominant bacterial pathogens associated with external auditory canal infections [15,16].
Clotrimazole was incorporated to provide antifungal activity. Although fungal organisms are not the primary cause of uncomplicated acute otitis externa, secondary fungal colonization may occur following disruption of the normal ear canal flora or prolonged topical antimicrobial therapy. Therefore, antifungal coverage may be advantageous in selected clinical settings. In addition, betamethasone contributes by suppressing local inflammation, reducing tissue edema, erythema, and pain, thereby improving the inflammatory environment during healing[2,5]. Based on these complementary mechanisms, this combination has the potential to provide simultaneous antibacterial, antifungal, and anti-inflammatory effects. In the present experimental study, the combination therapy achieved microbiological eradication comparable to that of ciprofloxacin–dexamethasone, supporting the concept that different topical formulations may produce similar therapeutic outcomes when appropriate antimicrobial coverage and inflammation control are achieved.
Our microbiological findings are consistent with previous studies demonstrating the effectiveness of topical antimicrobial therapy in the treatment of acute otitis externa. Randomized clinical trials have shown that topical fluoroquinolone-containing preparations achieve high bacterial eradication rates while providing favorable clinical outcomes. Likewise, recent systematic reviews have concluded that most currently available topical preparations are highly effective, with no consistent evidence supporting the superiority of one antimicrobial class over another [6-8]. In the present study, no statistically significant differences were observed between ciprofloxacin–dexamethasone and the bacitracin–polymyxin B–clotrimazole–betamethasone combination with respect to microbiological eradication. These findings are in agreement with current evidence suggesting that successful treatment of uncomplicated acute otitis externa depends primarily on adequate topical antimicrobial activity and control of local inflammation rather than the use of a specific antibiotic class [2,6].
Histopathological evaluation demonstrated progressive improvement in epithelial architecture and inflammatory changes in both treatment groups throughout the study period. Although statistically significant differences were observed only for epithelial thickness at selected time points, both active treatment groups consistently exhibited less inflammatory change than the untreated controls. The absence of significant differences in the remaining histopathological parameters may be related to the limited sample size and the ordinal scoring system used for histological assessment rather than the absence of biological treatment effects. These observations are consistent with the microbiological findings and suggest that successful bacterial eradication was accompanied by gradual resolution of tissue inflammation. Nevertheless, because this was an experimental animal study, the histopathological findings should be interpreted cautiously and cannot be directly extrapolated to clinical practice.
Current treatment strategies increasingly emphasize antimicrobial stewardship and the rational use of topical antibiotics. Recent evidence suggests that appropriate selection of topical therapy should consider not only antimicrobial efficacy but also safety, patient adherence, tympanic membrane status, and the potential impact on antimicrobial resistance [2,3,6].
Strengths of the Study
The present study has several strengths. First, the experimental design included random allocation of animals to treatment groups and blinded histopathological assessment, reducing the potential risk of observer bias. Second, both microbiological and histopathological outcomes were evaluated, allowing comprehensive assessment of treatment efficacy rather than relying solely on bacterial eradication. Third, the inclusion of an active comparator (ciprofloxacin–dexamethasone), which represents a widely accepted topical treatment for acute otitis externa, strengthened the clinical relevance of the experimental model. These methodological characteristics increase the internal validity of the study and provide a robust basis for comparison between the investigated treatment regimens.
Limitations
Several limitations should also be acknowledged. First, this was an experimental animal study, and therefore the findings cannot be directly extrapolated to human clinical practice. Second, the relatively small sample size within each subgroup may have limited the statistical power to detect subtle histopathological differences. Third, histopathological evaluation was based on semi-quantitative ordinal scoring, which may not fully capture minor tissue changes. In addition, pharmacokinetic properties, local drug concentrations, adverse effects, and long-term outcomes were not investigated. Therefore, although the present findings demonstrate comparable experimental efficacy between the two topical preparations, further well-designed clinical studies are required before this combination can be considered an alternative therapeutic option for patients with acute otitis externa.
Conclusion
In this experimental rat model of acute otitis externa, the bacitracin–polymyxin B–clotrimazole–betamethasone combination demonstrated microbiological and histopathological efficacy comparable to that of topical ciprofloxacin–dexamethasone. These findings provide preliminary experimental evidence supporting the potential therapeutic value of this combination. However, given the experimental nature of the study, further clinical investigations are required to confirm its efficacy and safety before routine clinical application can be recommended.Reference
1) Rosenfeld R M, Schwartz SR, Cannon CR, Roland PS, Simon GR , K umar K A, Huang WW, Haskell HW, R obertson PJ. Clinical practice guideline: acute otitis externa (update). Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2014;150(1 Suppl):S1-S24. (PMID: 24491310)
2) Jackson E A, G eer K . Acute otitis externa: rapid evidence review. Am Fam Physician. 2023;107(2):145-151. (PMID: 36791445)
3) Mughal Z , Swaminathan R , Al-Deerawi HB, Henney S, Bickerton R . A systematic review of antibiotic prescription for acute otitis externa. Cureus. 2021;13(3):e14149. (PMID: 33927951)
4) Roland PS, Stroman DW. Microbiology of acute otitis externa. Laryngoscope. 2002;112(7 Pt 1):1166-1177. (PMID: 12169893)
5) Kaushik V, Malik T , Saeed SR. Interventions for acute otitis externa. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(1):CD004740. (PMID: 20091565)
6) Di T raglia R , Tudor-Green B, Muzaffar J, Borsetto D, Smith ME. Antibiotics versus non-antibiotic treatments for acute otitis externa: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Otolaryngol. 2023;48(6):841-862. (PMID: 37550850)
7) Roland PS, Pien FD, Schultz CC, Henry DC, Conroy PJ, Wall G M, G aradi R , Dupre SJ, Potts SL, Hogg LG , Stroman DW. Efficacy and safety of topical ciprofloxacin/dexamethasone versus neomycin/polymyxin B/hydrocortisone for otitis externa. Curr Med R es Opin. 2004;20(8):1175-1183. (PMID: 15324520)
8) Chu L , Acosta AM, Aazami H, Dennis P, De Valle O, Eh-mer D Jr, Hedrick JA, Ansley JF. Efficacy and safety of ciprofloxacin plus fluocinolone acetonide among patients with acute otitis externa: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2022;5(7):e2221699. (PMID: 35834251)
9) Rasheed AM, Hilal SA, Abbas AM. Is adding an oral antibiotic with the topical antibiotic steroid useful in treatment of uncomplicated acute otitis externa in immunocompetent patients? J Popul T her Clin Pharmacol. 2022;29(2):e27-e32. (PMID: 35848194)
10) van Balen FAM, Smit WM, Z uithoff N PA, Verheij T JM. Clinical efficacy of three common treatments in acute otitis externa in primary care: randomised controlled trial. BMJ. 2003;327(7425):1201-1205. (PMID: 14630756)
11) Schaefer P, Baugh R F. Acute otitis externa: an update. Am Fam Physician. 2012;86(11):1055-1061. (PMID: 23198673)
12) Jackman A, Ward R , April M, Bent J. Topical antibiotic induced otomycosis. I nt J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2005;69(6):857-860. (doi: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2005.01.022)
13) Flint PW, Haughey BH, L und VJ, N iparko JK, Robbins KT, Thomas JR, L esperance MM, editors. Cummings Otolaryngology: Head and Neck Surgery. 6th ed. Philadelphia: Elsevier; 2015.
14) Dohar JE. Evolution of management approaches for otitis externa. Pediatr I nfect Dis J. 2003;22(4):299-305. (PMID: 12690268)

