NECK CUTANEOUS LEISHMANIASIS
2Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Tıbbi Mikrobiyoloji Anabilim Dalı, Şanlıurfa
3Şanlıurfa Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi, Tıbbi Patoloji, Şanlıurfa
4Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Enfeksiyon Hastalıkları Anabilim Dalı, Şanlıurfa
5Harran Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi, Çocuk Hastalıkları Anabilim Dalı, Şanlıurfa
Summary
Aim: Lesions in cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) commonly occur in uncovered areas of the body, such as the head and neck. CL, one of the major mimicking diseases, should be considered in the differential diagnosis of neck lesions, and laboratory methods should be used to confirm the diagnosis in suspected cases. The aim of this study is to examine the clinical features, diagnostic methods, and treatment options of CL localized to the neck. To the best of our knowledge, there has been no prior study in the literature specifically evaluating neck involvement in CL.Material and Methods: This retrospective study included 81 patients with CL lesions exclusively on the neck, diagnosed between September 2018 and October 2024 at the Diagnosis and Treatment Center for Oriental Boil in Şanlıurfa, an endemic region for CL. Clinical and demographic characteristics of the patients were retrieved from their medical records.
Results: Of the patients, 74% were male, and 26% were female. The mean age was 20.59 ± 15.86 years, and the majority (63%) were in the pediatric age group. Acute CL was identified in 66 patients, while 15 patients had chronic CL. The mean lesion duration was 11.56 ± 0.79 months. Solitary lesions were present in 63% of the patients, whereas 37% had multiple lesions, with a mean lesion count of 1.8. The mean lesion diameter was 14.38 ± 3.05 mm. The lesion types, in order of frequency, were nodulo-ulcerative, nodular, and papular. A total of 98.8% of patients responded to intralesional meglumine antimonate (ILMA) treatment, while the remaining one patient required systemic meglumine antimonate (MA) therapy.
Conclusion: Clinicians in endemic regions should always consider CL in the differential diagnosis of various types of neck lesions. ILMA is a highly effective treatment for neck CL.
Introduction
Cutaneous leishmaniasis is a vector-borne parasitic disease transmitted via Phlebotomus bites and is endemic in over 90 countries. Türkiye is among the countries where CL is endemic, and Şanlıurfa province reports the highest number of cases. Cutaneous leishmaniasis frequently affects exposed areas of the body; therefore, the head and neck region, along with the extremities, are highly susceptible to lesions[1,2]. Affected areas often exhibit solitary or multiple lesions, commonly presenting as ulcers, leading to significant consequences such as disfiguring scars, severe disability, and social stigma[3,4].Clinical suspicion of CL should be confirmed with laboratory methods, with microscopic identification of the parasite being the most commonly used diagnostic approach[5].
Patients should receive treatment after diagnosis to prevent their role as reservoirs for the disease. Pentavalent antimonial compounds are the most commonly used drugs for treatment[6].
The aim of this study is to evaluate the sociodemographic and clinical characteristics, diagnostic methods, and treatment options for CL localized to the neck.
Methods
This retrospective study included 81 patients diagnosed with CL lesions exclusively on the neck between September 2018 and October 2024 at the Diagnosis and Treatment Center for Oriental Boil in Şanlıurfa. CL diagnosis was confirmed through direct microscopic examination and histopathological analysis of the affected skin. Positive microscopic findings were defined as smears containing amastigotes with round or oval shapes, a dark purple-stained nucleus at one end, and a kinetoplast adjacent to it, with a pale blue cytoplasm. Positive histopathological findings were defined as preparations stained with hematoxylin and eosin or Giemsa showing amastigotes. Patient data, including gender, age, disease duration, lesion count, lesion diameter, lesion types, microscopic examination results, treatments received, and treatment responses, were collected from medical records.Patients diagnosed with CL received intramuscular meglumine antimonate (IMMA) or intralesional meglumine antimonate (ILMA). IMMA was administered at a dose of 20 mg/kg/day for 21 days, while ILMA was administered twice weekly for 4 weeks.
Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria
Inclusion criteria included being aged 0-80 years, having a diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis (CL) confirmed by microscopic or histopathological examination, and having neck involvement.
Exclusion criteria were incomplete medical records, lack of diagnostic confirmation through microscopic or histopathological examination, absence of neck involvement, and having lesions in areas other than or in addition to the neck.
All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008. Ethics committee approval was granted from Harran University Medical Faculty Hospital on 29.004.2024 with protocol number HRU.24.05.33.
Statistical Analysis
Patient data collected within the scope of the study were analysed with the IBM Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) for Windows 20.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) package program. Frequency and percentage for categorical data and mean and standard deviation for continuous data were given as descriptive values.
Results
The mean age of all individuals was 20.59 ± 15.86 years (range = 4-77 years), and 74.13% were male. Of the patients, 63% (n=51) were under 18 years of age. Sixteen percent were aged 19-36 years, 19.8% were aged 37-54 years, and only one patient was over 54 years old.A diagnosis of CL was established by direct microscopic examination of affected skin in 75 patients (92.5%) and by histopathological examination in 6 patients (7.5%).
The year with the highest diagnosis rate of neck CL cases was 2021 (34.6%), while the lowest rates were in 2023 and 2024 (3.7%). Throughout all years, male patients predominated (Figure 1).
![]() Büyütmek İçin Tıklayın |
Figure 1: Distribution of male/female neck CL cases according to years |
When all lesions were assessed according to their clinical appearances, the most common lesion type was nodulo-ulcerative (61.7%), followed by nodular (28.0%) and papular lesions (10.3%) (Table 1).
Table 1: Distrubition of cinical forms of CL lesions
When lesion counts were analyzed by age groups, solitary lesions were the most frequent in all age groups. Of the all CL patients 63,0% (51/81) had one lesion, 19,8 % (16/81) had two lesions, 7,4% (6/81) had three lesions, 4,9% (4/81) had four, 1,2% (1/81) had 5 lesions, 1,2% (1/81) had 6 lesions and 2,5% (2/81) had 9 lesions (Table 2).
Table 2: Distrubition of number of lesions according to age groups
The mean number of lesions was 1,8 ± 1,5 (range 1-9). The average lesion size (longest axis) was 14,38 ± 3,05 mm (range 5-60 mm) and the average lesion duration (month) was 11,56±0,79 (range 4-40) (Table 3).
Table 3: The mean number, the average size and duration of lesions
Acute CL was present in 81.5% of the patients, while 18.5% (n=15) had chronic disease.
Therapy of CL cases
%98,8 (n=80) of neck CL patients recovered after receiving only one course of IL MA (8 total injections of IL). %1,2 (n=1) of the CL patients were administered systemic MA therapy.
Discussion
Although no prior studies have exclusively focused on neck involvement in CL, a limited number of studies have specifically evaluated head and neck involvement in CL, where these regions are highly affected. In the study by Dunya et al., an analysis of the anatomical distribution of lesions in patients with head and neck involvement found that neck involvement accounted for only 3.1% of cases[1]. Studies reporting that when the head and neck regions are considered together, it is the region most commonly affected by CL. In Türkiye, studies have found that 60.7%, 58%, 57.3%, and 47.8% of patients with CL have head and neck region involvement, respectively. In the study of Uzun et al. who divided the head-neck region into detailed anatomical compartments and evaluated 1030 patients, only 1 lesion (0.1%) was found to be located in the neck, while in the study of Gurel et al. 2120 CL patients were evaluated and only 1.3% of the lesions were found to be located in the neck[7-10].In a study conducted in Iran in children diagnosed with CL below the age of 13 years, neck involvement was found with a rate of 4.1%[11].
When the head and neck region is considered together in CL, it is the region most commonly affected by CL in most studies, but most of the involvement of this region is localized on the face, while neck involvement is either absent or very low. During the period of our study, there were a total of 3246 patients diagnosed with CL in the Oriental Boil Diagnosis and Treatment Center in Şanlıurfa province and the rate of patients with isolated neck involvement was 2.5%. This rate is higher than the rates in the studies of Uzun et al and Gurel et al, which were previously conducted in our country with more patients.
Since neck involvement in cutaneous leishmaniasis is rarely reported, our study will contribute to the literature in terms of the involvement of this anatomical region.
Cutaneous leishmaniasis is most commonly observed in pediatric age groups in endemic areas. The lower frequency of cases in adults may be due to acquired immunity following infection during childhood[10,12]. In alignment with the literature, the majority of patients in this study (63%) were aged 0-18 years.
In the study by Dunya et al., which compared patients with and without head and neck involvement, the frequency of head and neck involvement was significantly higher in patients under 18 years of age. The mean age of the group with head and neck involvement was significantly lower than that of the group without involvement. This was attributed to children's longer sleep duration and their increased exposure to vector bites while sleeping, particularly in the head and neck regions[1].
In the study by Gurel et al., 68.5% of patients had a single lesion, 17.8% had two lesions, 7.6% had three lesions, and 2.4% had four lesions, with a mean lesion count of 1.6[9]. In the study by Gurel et al., 68.5% of patients had a single lesion, 17.8% had two lesions, 7.6% had three lesions, and 2.4% had four lesions, with a mean lesion count of 1.8[12].
In this study, 63% of patients had a single lesion, while 37% had multiple lesions, with a mean lesion count of 1.8. These findings were consistent with previous studies.
In the study by İnci et al., the most common clinical lesion type was nodulo-ulcerative lesions (54%), followed by papulonodular lesions (43%)[13]. Similarly, in the study by Gurel et al., nodulo-ulcerative lesions were the most common type, observed in 39.2% of patients, followed by nodular lesions (31.4%) and papular lesions (16.6%)[9]. The distribution of lesion types in our study was similar to these studies conducted in Türkiye. The most common lesion type was nodulo-ulcerative lesions (61.7%), followed by nodular lesions (28.0%) and papular lesions (10.3%).
Cutaneous leishmaniasis is referred to as the "great imitator" because it can mimic most dermatoses. Living in endemic areas or recent travel to endemic regions, along with the presence of long-standing asymptomatic papules, nodules, plaques, ulcers, or crusted ulcers in uncovered body areas, should alert clinicians to the possibility of CL. The diagnosis should be confirmed by parasitological or immunological laboratory methods[14,15].
As a first approach, it is recommended to obtain an appropriate sample for smearing, followed by staining with Giemsa and microscopic examination. Smear examination is a cost-effective, simple, and rapid diagnostic tool for CL. The detection of Leishmania amastigotes within and/or outside macrophages during microscopic examination, while not enabling species-level identification, is sufficient for diagnosis. A recently developed diagnostic algorithm suggests initiating Leishmania treatment if microscopic examination is positive with this method, and conducting further investigations via skin biopsy if results are negative. In our study, 75 patients (92.5%) were diagnosed by direct microscopic examination of affected skin, while in six patients (7.5%), the diagnosis was made via histopathological examination following a negative microscopic evaluation (Figure 2a-c). The diagnostic sensitivity of direct microscopic examination of cutaneous smear samples is significantly influenced by the examiner's experience[14,16]. All examinations in our study were conducted at the Diagnosis and Treatment Center for Oriental Boil, where the personnel have extensive experience with this method.
![]() Büyütmek İçin Tıklayın |
Figure 2a: Leishmaniasis showing a mixed inflammatory cell infiltrate. The infiltrate includes amastogotes and lymphocytes(HE; x400) Figure 2b: Giemsa stain showing amastogotes of Leishmania. Figure 2c: CD1a positive amastigotes (x200) |
Once the diagnosis is confirmed, treatment is recommended to accelerate healing, reduce the likelihood of recurrence, prevent the formation of disfiguring scars and the risk of disease dissemination, and prevent the patient from serving as a reservoir for the disease[17]. For these reasons, we treated all our patients.
Treatment options for CL are classified as topical treatments, intralesional injections, physical therapies, and systemic therapies. Certain considerations must be taken into account when selecting a treatment. Systemic treatments are preferred for patients with multiple lesions (>5), large lesions (>5 cm), lesions in functionally sensitive areas, or mucosal involvement. In cases with single or a few small lesions, the most ideal treatments are physical, topical, or intralesional therapies. Intralesional antimonial therapy (meglumine antimonate and sodium stibogluconate) has been one of the best treatment options for many years. It is particularly considered the gold standard for treating solitary and small lesions[6]. The majority of our patients had solitary or a small number of small lesions. Therefore, intralesional meglumine antimonate (IL MA) therapy was administered to all except one patient with numerous and large lesions. Treatment was successful in all patients. The single patient with multiple and large lesions was treated with systemic MA therapy and achieved recovery.
Limitations of Study
The retrospective nature of the study and the inability to perform species-level identification of the causative agent were the study's limitations.
Conclusion
In endemic areas, CL must be considered in the differential diagnosis of long-standing, non-healing lesions of various types on the neck. If suspected, laboratory investigations should confirm the diagnosis, and treatment should be initiated. IL MA therapy should be considered the first-line treatment for neck CL.Reference
1) Dunya G, Habib R, Moukarbel RV, Khalifeh I. Head and neck cutaneous leishmania: clinical characteristics, microscopic features and molecular analysis in a cohort of 168 cases. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016;273(11):3819-3826. [ Özet ]
2) Gürel MS, Yeşilova Y, Olgen MK, Ozbel Y. Türkiye'de Kutanöz Leishmaniasisin Durumu [Cutaneous leishmaniasis in Turkey]. Turkiye Parazitol Derg. 2012;36(2):121-9. Turkish. [ Özet ]
3) Ullah Z, Samad F, Bano R, Arif S, Zamir S, Aziz N, Khan H. Characterizing cutaneous leishmaniasis in a conflict-affected region: a study from North Waziristan, Pakistan. Turk J Med Sci. 2023;53(6):1767-1775. [ Özet ]
4) Hu RVPF, Ramdas S, Nieuwkerk P, Reis R, Lai A Fat RFM, de Vries HJC, Schallig HDFH. Body location of "New World" cutaneous leishmaniasis lesions and its impact on the quality of life of patients in Suriname. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2020;14(10):e0008759. [ Özet ]
5) Reimão JQ, Coser EM, Lee MR, Coelho AC. Laboratory Diagnosis of Cutaneous and Visceral Leishmaniasis: Current and Future Methods. Microorganisms. 2020;8(11):1632.) [ Özet ]
6) Aytekin S. Treatment Approaches for Cutaneous Leishmaniasis. Turkderm-Turk Arch Dermatol Venereol. 2009; 43(2): 44-47.
7) Turhanoglu M, Alp Erdal S, Bayindir Bilman F. Diyarbakır Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesinde dokuz yıllık kutanöz leyşmanyazis olgularının değerlendirilmesi [A nine-year evaluation of cutaneous leishmaniasis patients in Diyarbakir Training and Research Hospital, Turkey]. Mikrobiyol Bul. 2014;48(2):335-40. Turkish. [ Özet ]
8) Uzun S, Durdu M, Culha G, Allahverdiyev AM, Memişoğlu HR. Clinical features, epidemiology, and efficacy and safety of intralesional antimony treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis: recent experience in Turkey. J Parasitol 2004; 90: 853-9. [ Özet ]
9) Gurel MS, Ulukanligil M, Ozbilge H. Cutaneous leishmaniasis in Sanliurfa: epidemiologic and clinical features of the last four years (1997-2000). Int J Dermatol. 2002;41(1):32-7. [ Özet ]
10) Aksoy M, Doni N, Ozkul HU, Yesilova Y, Ardic N, Yesilova A, Ahn-Jarvis J, Oghumu S, Terrazas C, Satoskar AR. Pediatric Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in an Endemic Region in Turkey: A Retrospective Analysis of 8786 Cases during 1998-2014. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10(7):e0004835. [ Özet ]
11) Layegh P, Moghiman T, Ahmadian Hoseini SA. Children and cutaneous leishmaniasis: a clinical report and review. J Infect Dev Ctries. 2013;7(8):614-7. [ Özet ]
12) Yemisen M, Ulas Y, Celik H, Aksoy N. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 7172 patients with cutaneous leishmaniasis in Sanliurfa, between 2001 and 2008. Int J Dermatol. 2012;51(3):300-4. [ Özet ]
13) Inci R, Ozturk P, Mulayim MK, Ozyurt K, Alatas ET, Inci MF. Effect of the Syrian Civil War on Prevalence of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Southeastern Anatolia, Turkey. Med Sci Monit. 2015;21:2100-4. [ Özet ]
14) Gurel MS, Tekin B, Uzun S. Cutaneous leishmaniasis: A great imitator. Clin Dermatol. 2020;38(2):140-151. [ Özet ]
15) Uzun S, Gürel MS, Durdu M, Akyol M, Fettahlıoğlu Karaman B, Aksoy M, Aytekin S, Borlu M, İnan Doğan E, Doğramacı ÇA, Kapıcıoğlu Y, Akman-Karakaş A, Kaya TI, Mülayim MK, Özbel Y, Özensoy Töz S, Özgöztaşı O, Yeşilova Y, Harman M. Clinical practice guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Turkey. Int J Dermatol. 2018;57(8):973-982. [ Özet ]
16) Aronson NE, Joya CA. Cutaneous Leishmaniasis: Updates in Diagnosis and Management. Infect Dis Clin North Am. 2019;33(1):101-117. [ Özet ]
17) Harman, M. Cutaneous Leishmaniasis. Turk J Dermatol. 2015;9:168-76.